Files and directories are kept both in main memory and on disk, and care must taken to ensure that system failure does not result in loss of data or in data inconsistency. We deal with these issues in the following sections.
As discussed in Section 11.3, some directory information is kept in main memory (or cache) to speed up access. The directory information in main memory is generally more up to date than is the corresponding information on the disk, because cached directory information is not necessarily written to disk as soon as the update takes place.
Consider, then, the possible effect of a computer crash. Cache and buffetcontents, as well as I/O operations in progress, can be lost, and with them any changes in the directories of opened files. Such an event can leave the file system in an inconsistent state: The actual state of some files is not as described in the directory structure. Frequently, a special program is run at reboot time to check for and correct disk inconsistencies.
The consistency checker—a systems program such as f sck in UNIX or chkdsk in MS-DOS—compares the data in the directory structure with the data blocks on disk and tries to fix any inconsistencies it finds. The allocation and free-space-management algorithms dictate what types of problems the checker can find and how successful it will be in fixing them. For instance, if linked allocation is used and there is a link from any block to its next block, then the entire file can be reconstructed from the data blocks, and the directory structure can be recreated.
In contrast, the loss of a directory entry on an indexed allocation system can be disastrous, because the data blocks have no knowledge of one another. For this reason, UNIX caches directory entries for reads; but any data write that results in space allocation, or other metadata changes, is done synchronously, before the corresponding data blocks are written. Of course, problems can still occur if a synchronous write is interrupted by a crash.
Backup and Restore
|Topics You May Be Interested In|
|Paging In Operating System||Communication Protocols|
|Free Space Management||An Example-windows Xp|
|Disk Scheduling||What Is Multics?|
|File Access Methods||What Is Ibm Os/360?|
|Log-structured File Systems||Event Ordering|
Magnetic disks sometimes fail, and care must be taken to ensure that the data lost in such a failure are not lost forever. To this end, system programs can be used to back up data from disk to another storage device, such as a floppy disk, magnetic tape, optical disk, or other hard disk.
Recovery from the loss of an individual file, or of an entire disk, may then be a matter of restoring the data from backup. To minimize the copying needed, we can use information from each file's directory entry. For instance, if the backup program knows when the last backup of a file was done, and the file's last write date in the directory indicates that the file has not changed since that date, then the file does not need to be copied again. A typical backup schedule may then be as follows:
• Day 1. Copy to a backup medium all files from the disk. This is called a full backup.
• Day 2. Copy to another medium all files changed since day 1. This is an incremental backup.
• Day 3. Copy to another medium all files changed since day 2.
• Day N. Copy to another medium all files changed since day N— 1. Then go back to Day 1. The new cycle can have its backup written over the previous set or onto a new set of backup media.
In this manner, we can restore an entire disk by starting restores with the full backup and continuing through each of the incremental backups. Of course, the larger the value of N, the greater the number of tapes or disks that must be read for a complete restore. An added advantage of this backup cycle is that we can restore any file accidentally deleted during the cycle by retrieving the deleted file from the backup of the previous day.
The length of the cycle is a compromise between the amount of backup medium needed and the number of days back from which a restore can be done. To decrease the number of tapes that must be read, to do a restore, an option is to perform a full backup and then each day back up all files that have changed since the full backup. In this way, a restore can be done via the most recent incremental backup and. the full backup, with no other incremental backups needed. The trade-off is that more files will be modified each day, so each successive incremental backup involves more files and more backup media.
A user may notice that a particular file is missing or corrupted long after the damage was done. For this reason, we usually plan to take a full backup from time to time that will be saved "forever." It is a good idea to store these permanent backups far away from the regular backups to protect against hazard, such as a fire that destroys the computer and all the backups too. And if the backup cycle reuses media, we must take care not to reuse the media too many times—if the media wear out, it might not be possible to restore any data from the backups.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Operating System Concepts ( Multi tasking, multi programming, multi-user, Multi-threading )
- Different Types of Operating Systems
- Batch Operating Systems
- Time sharing operating systems
- Distributed Operating Systems
- Network Operating System
- Real Time operating System
- Various Operating system services
- Architectures of Operating System
- Monolithic architecture - operating system
- Layered Architecture of Operating System
- Microkernel Architecture of operating system
- Hybrid Architecture of Operating System
- System Programs and Calls
- Process Management - Process concept